Competition Archives - The AIM Institute Your goal should be to waste fewer innovation resources than competitors.

Blog Category: Competition

Your goal should be to waste fewer innovation resources than competitors.

516-Wasted-Resources

Well now, isn’t that inspirational? Perhaps not… but remember you’re in a constant battle with competitors to innovate for customers. One of the best ways to tip the “efficiency” balance in your favor is to consistently learn when projects are unattractive… faster than competitors. Then decisively kill them so resources can be used for winning projects. One of the best ways to do this is to generate Market Satisfaction Gaps.

More in white paper, Market Satisfaction Gaps

Pursuing the right customer needs requires divergent and convergent thinking… in that order.

515-Divergent-Paths

For every job a customer does, there are dozens of potential outcomes… so diverge with customers to uncover far more than competitors. Then ask for 1-10 importance and satisfaction ratings so your R&D can converge on the important, unsatisfied outcomes… while competitors guess. I’d like to make this sound more complicated, but it’s not.

More in white paper, Market Satisfaction Gaps

Look for Landmines and Launchpads… especially in unfamiliar markets.

511-Landmine

A Landmine can kill your project… but who steps on a Landmine they can see? When you convert assumptions and questions into facts, you make landmines visible and therefore harmless. A Launchpad is an unexpected, high-value customer outcome. Discover these before competitors to develop solutions in a “competition-free zone.” This approach is perfect for your Horizon 2 and 3 projects.

For more, see 5-minute video at www.deriskprojects.com

Product development is a footrace… either a customer-reactive or a market-proactive footrace.

462-Business-Footrace

Picture this: A customer tells your sales rep what they want, who hands it off to your R&D. This clever customer tells your competitors the same thing. Terrific. If more than one supplier crosses the finish line, you can forget any price premium. Try this: You choose the race conditions by targeting an attractive market, and exploring its needs better than competitors. This is one reason why market-facing innovation is superior to customer reactive innovation.

More in 2-minute video at 16. Segment by markets for innovation

Quickly identify any over-served markets. Then sprint in the opposite direction.

433-Lower-Price

If all customer outcomes in a market are either unimportant or already satisfied, you’ll see low Market Satisfaction Gaps. This is an over-served market, and there’s only one thing that makes these customers happy: Dropping your price. Race to more attractive markets and hope your competitors waste resources here. Have you identified your over-served markets yet?

More in white paper, www.marketsatisfactiongaps.com

Avoid the 4 Traps of Predicting Technology Adoption

Avoid the 4 traps of technology prediction using jobs-to-be-done (JTBD) thinking that is informed by the voice of the customer. Image of a large door open to the future.

It’s natural to ruminate on the future; in particular, about technology adoption. What changes will future technology waves bring?  Will we ride them to riches or drown under the weight of disruption? A Danish proverb warns that “Prediction is dangerous, especially about the future.” A cycle of bad logic Unfortunately, when we theorize, we can ... Read More

Chasing the Fast Follower Myth

Bigfoot is as real as the fast follower

What is a “fast follower?” What’s a fast follower definition? Well, consider this: Bigfoot and the fast follower strategy have much in common. Namely, they’re both myths. Bigfoot, of course, is that Chewbacca-like beast that supposedly has roamed North America for thousands of years. And he (or she?) surely must be real because of all ... Read More

Is your operating plan promising faster growth than the markets you serve? Be nervous.

417-Operating-Plan

Do you think your competitors also plan to exceed market growth? So, all the competing suppliers plan to grow faster than the market they serve, year… after year… after year. As Dr. Phil would say, “How’s that been working for you?” Maybe it’s time for a different plan. A plan built on innovation, not hope… on well-grounded skills, not blue-sky spreadsheets.

More in 2-minute video at 2. Superior B2B growth is challenging

Don’t count on your R&D people being brighter than competitors’.

416-Research-and-Development

Will you win because your R&D people are 20% smarter than the competition’s? If that logic sounds shaky, here’s a suggestion: What if your R&D worked only on problems customers truly cared about… while competitors kept guessing what to work on? Would that be a competitive advantage? This is easier than you think… but maybe you’d rather try to hire geniuses.

More in white paper, www.catchtheinnovationwave.com (page 4)

You can’t achieve profitable, sustainable growth behaving like your competitors.

413-Competitive-Behavior

Unless your company has smarter employees, some inherent unassailable advantage, or a markedly different approach to satisfying customers… pesky competitors will always limit your growth. What if you and your competitors were all committing the same innovation errors… but you corrected them first? Good news: There is much to correct.

More in research report, www.whatdrivesb2borganicgrowth.com

preload imagepreload image