Our research asked B2B professionals what drives profitable, sustainable organic growth. The #1 answer was delivering strong, differentiated value propositions. And the #1 differentiator between the best and worst value-creating companies was superior front end of innovation work (www.whatdrivesb2borganicgrowth.com).
There are important front-end steps top-performing companies take to strengthen their value propositions. Consider seven steps using this lens: If you omit this step, how is your value proposition weakened? Do you have the tools to execute step well? As you might expect, not all steps are created equal. Some have a much higher impact on your value proposition than others.
If you omit this step, how is your value proposition weakened?
In this step, you target an attractive market segment… a cluster of customers with similar needs. Sometimes these segments are already well-known. In other cases, you must first conduct secondary market research.
What you miss: Skipping this exposes you to two risks. First, you’ll hear a hodgepodge of needs if customers are not in a well-defined common cluster… making it impossible to design a product satisfying all. Second, you’ll squander R&D resources if you don’t focus on the best market segment. One that is winnable and worth winning.
Advice: Our research shows top value-creators excel at market concentration… selecting an attractive market segment and disproportionately focusing their resources on it. You need to do this step and do it well.
These are qualitative interviews that the customer—not you—leads. Ask for their desired outcomes, probe, and then ask, “What else?” Do not try to validate your solution or employ a boring questionnaire. The best interviewers project their notes, use special probing methods, and employ techniques to trigger fresh customer thinking.
What you miss: Without these divergent interviews, you can expect errors of omission… failing to uncover unarticulated customer needs. Are teams faulted for these errors? No, because no one realizes something was omitted. Another problem is the failure to engage. You miss the chance to impress customers as a supplier that listens to and meets their needs. Never forget that customer needs are the inputs to the front end of innovation.
Advice: Our research shows B2B customer interviews are in the top 3 (of 24) differentiators between the best and worst value-creators. These interviews let you discover what competitors have overlooked, perhaps leading to a game-changing new product. You’ll also enjoy near-term sales opportunities because customers want to work with a supplier interested in them.
During these quantitative interviews you ask customers to rate the importance and current satisfaction of several outcomes. Also ask them how they would test for each outcome… and how good is “good enough” for each outcome test.
What you miss: Without these convergent interviews, you’re essentially “guessing” what customers want. I know this sounds harsh, but you cannot trust qualitative data alone. Customers may tell you what you want to hear, and you’ll surely hear what you want to hear. This is called “confirmation bias,” and the only antidote is asking customers to think hard in a structured manner and give you quantitative data in an unfiltered fashion.
Advice: Want one step that puts your front end of innovation success rate head-and-shoulders above competitors? This is it. Don’t do any substantial product development work without this quantitative data. Then your R&D will be laser-focused on only those product designs customers want.
Want one step that puts your innovation success rate head-and-
shoulders above competitors?
Here you benchmark competitive products—and perhaps your current products—using the test methods you gleaned from Preference interviews.
What you miss: Expect two problems if you omit front end of innovation step. First your new product prototypes can “miss the mark” because your test methods measured success differently than customers. Second you won’t set an optimized new product price… which is driven by the value you deliver beyond customers’ next-best alternative. You need to quantitatively measure alternatives using the same outcomes and test methods customers employ.
Advice: The first three steps are the most important for any project. For larger, high-impact projects, add this step to optimize both your product design and pricing.
The front end of innovation should be driven with data. When done with rigor, you set specific product design targets a) for the outcomes customers care most about, b) using their test methods, c) bounded by their points of “barely acceptable” and “totally satisfied,” and d) plotted against the best competitive products.
What you miss: Skip this and you’ll enter the development stage without crystal-clear design targets… leading to inefficiencies in this high “burn rate” stage. You’ll also omit trade-off analysis, a powerful part of this step (beyond the scope of this article).
Advice: You’ll certainly set some product objectives in the front-end, so this is a matter of degree. Your rigor should increase with rising project complexity, R&D costs, and market impact.
Until now, your team has focused on customer outcomes. Now you conduct technical brainstorming sessions for possible solutions, one session for each customer outcome you wish to improve.
What you miss: When you present a business case to management, you want to impress them with your understanding of market needs. But if they ask how you’ll address those needs, you shouldn’t say, “We don’t have a clue.” Some technical brainstorming lets you explain the technical paths you’ll take in the development stage.
Advice: This front end of innovation step is not mission-critical. But it does allow for more productive gate-reviews and a faster start in the development stage.
This is sometimes called the “money gate” in within the front end of innovation. Here you tell management why this project should proceed into the costly development stage.
What you miss: Some companies let projects quietly “drift” into the development stage. If your business isn’t demanding rigor—especially quantitative evidence of customer needs—it’s a good bet your R&D is being wasted developing products customers never wanted.
Advice: In one of our research studies, we found that five of six teams changed their product designs greatly or significantly with proper B2B customer interviews (Guessing at Customer Needs). If only one of six teams is on the right track, maybe your process gate needs a sturdier latch.
Maybe your process gate needs a sturdier latch.
Let’s close with three takeaways. First, you can give an enormous boost to your front end of innovation success by simply conducting the initial three steps above. We’ve recently introduced a six-point “Market Case” that captures this needed information. Fill out the form below and we’ll send you a free sample.
Second, you’re not running a solo race. We’ve seen many clients use these steps to grow much faster than the markets they serve. This means their competitors will grow slower… and not even realize why. It’s worth asking if your company is poised to win or lose these races.
Third, this always boils down to management commitment. That’s why we’ve recently published the e-book, Leader’s Guide to B2B Organic Growth. I invite you to download this at www.leadersguidetogrowth.com and get it in the right hands. For 2-minute videos on the same 30 lessons, visit www.leadersguidevideos.com.
Someday, you may have to do all seven steps very well to win your races. Today, you need to get started on the most important.